# It’s the Friday Puzzle!

65

Please do NOT post your answer, but do say if you think you have solved the puzzle and how long it took. Solution on Monday.

Two quick puzzles this week.

1) Can you use three 2s to create an expression (such as ‘2+2+2’) that equals 11?

2) Can you use each of the digits 0-9 once to create an expression that equals 1?

I have produced an ebook containing 101 of the previous Friday Puzzles! It is called PUZZLED and is available for the Kindle (UK here and USA here) and on the iBookstore (UK here in the USA here). You can try 101 of the puzzles for free here.

## 65 comments on “It’s the Friday Puzzle!”

1. Anne Elk says:

The second one took me about a minute, with a pen and a post-it note. I can’t do the first one though. I bet it’s dead obvious but I can’t do it. I even tried to cheat and I googled it and found a website posing a similar question — use two number 2s and any symbol to make 5 — and you wouldn’t believe the arguments!

• Barry Goddard says:

Just commenting at the top to warn you if you worry about such things, that I posted an answer to Q1 below, and others have posted answers to Q2. It really doesn’t matter that Prof Wiseman says not to post the answer.

• Garry Boddard says:

I’ve done the first one using a bitwise operator. Not sure if this is what’s intended.

2. Walter Ring says:

1.) three twos or ONLY three twos? 🙂
2.) endless solutions

• Anne Elk says:

I really hope it’s ONLY three 2s or I’ve been wasting my time! If you can use as many as you want then it’s a piece of piss.

• Eddie says:

Well said, Anne.

3. Anonymous says:

0.1s
1) no
2) no

• Garry Boddard says:

Actually my favourite comment ever.

• Eddie says:

Actually when Richard says “can you…”, I think he means “can one…”

• Dave Prendergast says:

You think wrong, Edster.

4. Pigturion says:

I can only do the first puzzle if I tri to base my maths along on different thinking.

5. Eddie says:

Both simple done quickly. Ask me how.

• Berhard says:

Yes and no. 😉

• DAve says:

How?

• Stay with us Scotland says:

2+2+2+16

I satisfied the criteria of using three 2s and there is nothing in the wording that suggests that I cannot use other numbers.

35 148
— + — = 1
70 296

• Anonymussel says:

Classic spoiler, wee man. Good work… The only problem is, your first answer’s wrong.

6. Barry Goddard says:

If is good to have a puzzle that does not wrap the question up in ambiguous words. (Such as “I have three couples coming to a party and I need to seat them at a table in 22 ways. What should I do?”)

If factorials are allowed we can have (2! + 2!)! – 2!

• I Luv Spoilers says:

Thanks Barry – you are a star

• Tophere says:

Log (22)^2

• One Eyed Jack says:

In your rush to be smug, you over complicated the answer.

(2+2)! – 2 = 22

sqrt(22^2) also works.

7. Stay with us Scotland says:

You’re right

(2+2)! – 2

• Anonymussel says:

I appreciate a spoiler who can learn from his mistakes. Sterling work, wee man.

• Tophere says:

Woah, serious brain fart. Here’s what I should have typed: sqrt(22)^2

8. The Masked Twit says:

One minute for the two.

• Eddie says:

How long for each?

9. ctj says:

the second puzzle has an embarrassingly simple solution. staywithusscotland’s answer is nice too.

since the easiest answer to the first puzzle has already been spoiled, i’m curious how many solutions work.

10. Sheldon Cooper says:

Off the top of my head

138/276 + 45/90 = 1
140/368 + 57/92 = 1
143/528 + 70/96 = 1
145/290 + 38/76 = 1
148/296 + 35/70 = 1
169/507 + 32/48 = 1
185/370 + 46/92 = 1
186/372 + 45/90 = 1
204/867 + 39/51 = 1
207/549 + 38/61 = 1
208/793 + 45/61 = 1
231/609 + 54/87 = 1
269/807 + 34/51 = 1
273/406 + 19/58 = 1
276/345 + 18/90 = 1
284/710 + 39/65 = 1
287/369 + 10/45 = 1
306/459 + 27/81 = 1
307/614 + 29/58 = 1
307/921 + 56/84 = 1
308/462 + 19/57 = 1
309/618 + 27/54 = 1
310/465 + 29/87 = 1
315/609 + 42/87 = 1
351/702 + 48/96 = 1
357/408 + 12/96 = 1
369/574 + 10/28 = 1
372/465 + 18/90 = 1
375/480 + 21/96 = 1
381/762 + 45/90 = 1
405/729 + 36/81 = 1
417/695 + 32/80 = 1
426/710 + 38/95 = 1
451/902 + 38/76 = 1
473/528 + 10/96 = 1
481/962 + 35/70 = 1
485/970 + 13/26 = 1
485/970 + 16/32 = 1
485/970 + 31/62 = 1
486/972 + 15/30 = 1
504/623 + 17/89 = 1
507/819 + 24/63 = 1
540/972 + 36/81 = 1
609/783 + 12/54 = 1
630/945 + 27/81 = 1
678/904 + 13/52 = 1
728/936 + 10/45 = 1
735/840 + 12/96 = 1
748/935 + 12/60 = 1

• Anne Elk says:

Very funny, Sheldon! That made me laugh out loud.

• I Luv Spoilers says:

It’s like all of my birthdays and Christmases have come at once.
PS You must have a very big head.

11. Geodetective says:

I don’t have an answer for the first yet (except for the spoiler I just read). But I’ve got 362880 simple answers for the second, but there are many many more answers possible!

12. Jill Burton says:

Second one is so simple – a very large number of possibles (can’t be bothered to work out how many) but they bear no resemblance to the ones given above!

13. mittfh says:

1) I’d tried powers, but until I looked at the comments, I didn’t think of using factorials.
2) As others have said, there are numerous solutions, but among them is at least one which only uses addition and subtraction, plus uses all the digits in order without combining them (e.g. 5 + 6 + 7 + 8, not 56 + 78).

14. Liam says:

Since the cat is out of the bag ((0/9)+1+2+7+8)/(3+4+5+6)=1

• Barry Goddard says:

Why go to so much trouble?

0*(2+3+4+5+6+7+8+9) + 1

15. Gareth says:

If we’re allowed to spoil, for 2), put the numbers 1-9 in a bracket doing anything you want, then raise the bracket to the power of zero.

• ctj says:

this. i’m surprised so many people went for the more complicated arithmetic solutions first.

16. Gareth Hunt and His Parrot says:

Man rock it old school, blood. None them factorial ting, allow it.

9-8+7-6-5+4+3-2-1 = 1

• Barry Goddard says:

@Gareth. You answer fails at the first hurdle as it does not use the zero.

I have made an answer that looks like your but does use the zero:

(9 + 8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2) x 0 + 1 = 1

It is possible to create some variations on that answer by changing some of the pluses to minuses or multiplies. Some also can be changed to divides but take care if dividing by zero. It is also possible to change all the numbers except the zero to number factorial!

Many other similar changes can be made. I think this answer is one of the most flexible templates possible for this puzzle.

• Gareth Hunt and His Parrot says:

Allow it, Bazza! Point blank scerrrrutch!

9-8+7-6-5+4+3-2-1+0 = 1

Bare cheers bludfam.

17. ctj says:

|√(22^2)| is a valid alternative solution to #1.

• Eddie says:

My answer to the second was (123,456,789)^0 = 1.

Also (0-1)+(2-3)-(4-5)-(6-7)-(8-9) = 1

18. Got both fairly quickly. The 0-9 one took a bit longer and involved pen and paper (well, keyboard and screen, to be precise). 🙂

19. Ken Haley says:

Many answers have already been given… so I guess I’m not spoiling anything with mine:

1. (2+2)! – 2 (already given above)
2. (9-8) x (7-6) x (5-4) x (3-2) x (1-0) = 1

I also like Eddie’s answer of raising digits 1-9 to the 0th power.

• Norman Widsom says:

I like your Number 2, Ken.

• Eddie says:

Me 2.

20. Alex says:

#1. (2 * 2)! – 2 = 22
#2. 123456789^0=1

Today is day when everybody breaks rule. lol

21. Hugh Janus says:

The dog travelled 10 km. Sorry, I’m late with the answer

22. Kristian says:

First one took some time, during which I also found a way to get 178000 billions using only three 2’s and the sinus function.

Second one took one try (adding and subtracting the numbers until they fit).

• ChrisR says:

I haven’t heard of that – who nose what it is?

I couldn’t do the first until I read the above but I got the same answer as Ken in a few seconds

23. Michael says:

Nobody seems to care about not spoiling this one. But there are a large number of answers to both questions. I got one answer for each puzzle in about thirty seconds, but there are obviously more.

24. Anonymous says:

Q1 took me ages, but I got there and kicked myself for taking so long. Q2 took about 2 mins.

25. Barry Goddard says:

To complete the posting of solutions we should also note:

CEILING [2 22]

FLOOR [1 234567890]

Where (if we had the ability to enter mathematical cymbals) CEILING and FLOOR represent the cymbals for “find the set element that is smallest/largest”.

We could for example use this to get 22 from any number of 2s. This is probably an optimal solution to the puzzle.

Please note that not all the posts from me have been from me. Once again someone else (perhaps more than one someone) has used my name to cover up their own name in disguise.

• ChrisR says:

what have cymbals got to do with it? That answer is just noise

26. Nitwit says:

Wow; talk about self-realization starvation…

27. John Cartwright says:

(1) about 1 second
(2) about 20 seconds – 15 seconds before I noticed an easy way to do it, then 5 seconds to check.

28. John Cartwright says:

I wrote my answer (above) before reading the thread. As so many people have already given their answers, I might as well do so too:
(1) (2+2)! – 2
(2) (9+8+6) – (7+5+4+3+2+1) = 1
I did number (2) by starting with the fact that 9+8+7+6+5+4+3+2+1 = 45, so it was just a matter of splitting it into one lot of 23 and another lot of 22.

But I like the (anything)^0 option. How about (9^(8^(7^(6^(5^(4^(3^(2+1)!)!)!)!)!)!) ^ 0 ?

29. Ken Haley says:

With the way many people reply, I’d suggest Richard should just change the rules, inviting people to post their answers right away. Tell everybody not to read the comments if they don’t want to see spoilers.

• MathMiles says:

I wonder if Richard even knows that people regularly post the answers – there’s no evidence that he reads the comments.

30. Ed Milliband, Jimmy Saville & Gary Glitter says:

These two questions have us all completely stumped.
Would anyone consider giving us a teensy weeny clue?

• Barry Goddard says:

If the three of you glance at some of the other comments you will find a range of possible answers, some with explanations of why they are right and some with explanations about why they are wrong.

These answers may not correspond with the official answer which will be available on Monday (local time). The official answer is usually given without further explanation and that off times leads to discussions about precise readings of the original puzzled necessary to arrive at the official solution.

31. Lazy T says:

’2+2+2′ = 2
0-9 = 1

• Lazy T says:

wottatwit
’2+2+2′ = 22
of course

32. xXx says:

Since almost everyone here ignore the rules…
1: abs(22.2)
2: (any combination)^0

• Zev Eisenberg says:

I think you mean floor(22.2) or round(22.2). abs(22.2) is still 22.2.

33. Mary says:

Yes, I can do both. The first involved signs and the second factorials.