Answer to the Friday Puzzle…..

18

cover

On Friday I posted this puzzle…..

There was a family reunion involving the following people: one grandfather, one grandmother, two fathers, two mothers, four children, three grandchildren, one brother, two sisters, two sons, two daughters, one father-in-law, one mother-in-law, and one daughter-in-law. But only seven people attended. Who were they (e.g., a boy, his mother, etc)?

If you haven’t tried to solve it, have a go now.  For everyone else, the answer is after the break.

There were two girls and a boy, their parents, and their father’s parents.  Did you solve it?

I have produced an ebook containing 101 of the previous Friday Puzzles! It is called PUZZLED and is available for the Kindle (UK here and USA here) and on the iBookstore (UK here in the USA here). You can try 101 of the puzzles for free here.

18 comments on “Answer to the Friday Puzzle…..

  1. Eddie says:

    Got it. Why weren’t the solutions posted Friday removed? Come on Richard, let’s have some hands-on, effective policing here.

    • Anne Elk says:

      Also got it… As far as I can recall, Richard has never contributed to the comments. He can record our comments for an experiment and his own comments would skew the data.

  2. Baker's Dozen says:

    Why have comments?

    • mgm75 says:

      I agree. When you remove people posting the answers, all you really have is a succession of people saying “got it in 2 mins”… “3 mins for me”…. “I think i know but will need pen and paper to check when I get home”.

    • Alma says:

      Why are you READING the comments and putting one??🙂 Interaction is good!

    • Mary Berry says:

      Baker Boy
      We have comments so that idiots can display their genius [and vice versa].
      PS The above does not apply to my own comment.

    • Lazy T says:

      Why have pies?
      ( if you or Mary have any spares, send them over, and I’ll dispose of them)

  3. Barry Goodard says:

    I beleive the true answer is simpler than the one Mr Wiseman promotes.

    We need just two people, both perhaps transgendered. The other are superfluid.

    For surely for example I can be a Mother-In-Law without my Mother-In-Law being present in the room. Thus they each embody all the relationships.

  4. Hugh Janus says:

    It wouldn’t be a problem in Norfolk

  5. Tom says:

    Isn’t that three children rather than four (or five if you include the parents as children of the grandparents)?

    • Chris says:

      That’s also what confused me, but then i realised, the daughter-in-law is not a child of the parents currently present.

  6. akanksha says:

    one grand father his wife grand mother.
    his son and son’s wife (i.e. daughter in law)
    their 3 children ( 1 son , 2 daughters)

  7. Steve says:

    I’ve been reading this blog for any great when. Keep up the great job you are doing here.

  8. Hello there! Your write-up rocks as well as being a legitimate superb realize!??

  9. Reading this post – the gift of one’s time

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s