I started out searching for a much smaller baby hidden in the details, but as soon as I entertained an alternative hypothesis (that the baby might be big enough to fill most of the image), then I saw it.
Toes, then the rest followed. Interestingly there is a sad looking cock directly west of those toes that seems to be penetrating the tree’s trunk. If you look carefully, for perhaps less than 30 minutes, you might also note a scrotum directly west of the knee; slightly south (as one would expect) of the cock. [Don’t look at it if you wish to avoid being unable to not see it. Why do warnings so often come too late?]
I first looked at the spce surrounded by the crossing branches (above the couple). When I realised that it didn’t turn into a baby, the feet resolved. The baby ensued.
I saw the cock first and as I was wondering what sort of perverse photo Richard had posted, the baby appeared and I realized he is an upstanding chap after all.
I could see nothing the first time. Took another look the next day out popped the feet and everything else followed.
Maybe we could design a personality test according to what feature shows first.
Feet first, for me.
Same for me, saw the feet and then the rest was *just there*. Took a few seconds tho
Feet first for me as well.
Same here.
and here.
Yep.
I saw the feet first, too.
i dont see any
I don’t see it….
OH MY GOSH!!! I SEE IT NOW! OFFICIALLY CREEPED OUT NOW….
I’m not sure I’ll ask my Mum.
[Feet first]
U are A bum bum
U
Feet first, too.
I also saw the feet first
U are fat
Arms first. Took a while, but now, of course, I can’t un-see it!
Breech birth for me too.
I saw the feet first and had to work at it to find the head.
U are dump
Feet first, but only after I turned the picture upside down
How did you turn the picture upside down?!
Nice!
Feet first
I started out searching for a much smaller baby hidden in the details, but as soon as I entertained an alternative hypothesis (that the baby might be big enough to fill most of the image), then I saw it.
Toes, then the rest followed. Interestingly there is a sad looking cock directly west of those toes that seems to be penetrating the tree’s trunk. If you look carefully, for perhaps less than 30 minutes, you might also note a scrotum directly west of the knee; slightly south (as one would expect) of the cock. [Don’t look at it if you wish to avoid being unable to not see it. Why do warnings so often come too late?]
Feet first.
I honestly couldn’t see the baby until I read the comments but it was face first for me
Breech for me too: feet first.
Feet first
Toes first, then followed the shape round to the head.
I saw the feet first.🙂
Feet first, then hands. Did not see the face until after reading the caption.
Sweet! Face first for me.
Can anyone help me here??
I am trying for last 1 hour but no baby has popped up.
Look at white spaces between tree trunk and branches. Baby is huge comparing to adults standing at the lake.
finally!!!!!
got it.
thanx
Saw face first,then whole babay. Too much detail – obviously faked.
It’s a painting. What do you mean, faked?
First saw the weird and unnaturally spiky branch shapes, which led me to the feet, and then oh yeah there it is.
I first looked at the spce surrounded by the crossing branches (above the couple). When I realised that it didn’t turn into a baby, the feet resolved. The baby ensued.
Funnily enough, that’s how I ‘discovered’ the baby too…
I had to have help as I was looking for a big round face and to me this looks more like a fetus on the ultrasound. Cool photo nonetheless.
Took a while. Face first.
I saw the feet first, but if I hadn’t been looking for a baby I don’t think I would have seen it at all.
I saw the feet first.
I’m another breech
Head
I saw the cock first and as I was wondering what sort of perverse photo Richard had posted, the baby appeared and I realized he is an upstanding chap after all.
saw ‘that’ first too…
Feet first
Feet
Feet here
Feet first, and I only knew to look for it because you said what to look for.
Feet first because I first looked for it in the middle of the tree…
I saw its belly first because I thought, that’s a weird looking branch. Then I looked right then left, so…
Someone help that poor abused tree, everyone forgets about the tree.
I could see nothing the first time. Took another look the next day out popped the feet and everything else followed.
Maybe we could design a personality test according to what feature shows first.
@Henry Ruddlem. Was that the ‘cock’ and ‘upstanding chap’ pun intented? Heehee!
@Henry Ruddle. Was that the ‘cock’ and ‘upstanding chap’ pun intented? Heehee!
Arms first… I saw a funnily-looking branch, and then I examined it further – that led me to the arms, and the rest followed later.
No, I can’t see the baby for the semi-erect penis.
I saw the face first. Until I saw the comments here I noticed that he also arms and feet.
Gabriela Bernal,
South Korea
knees first -> feet -> whole baby
baby bassinet…
[…]Can you see the baby for the trees? « Richard Wiseman[…]…
evenflo baby gate…
[…]Can you see the baby for the trees? « Richard Wiseman[…]…
Ya
Can anyone tell us who the original artist was?
I saw a baby and a lake
What r these kind of pics called