A big hello to all the new people who have been kind enough to follow me on Twitter – almost up to 14,000 now!

Here is this week’s puzzle …

Can you create 8 equilateral triangles with just 6 matches?

Update: You are not allowed to break the matches! Also, what is the greatest number of equilateral triangles you can make with the matches?

As ever, please do not post your answer, but do say if you think you have solved it and how long it took. Have a great weekend and i will see you next week.


  1. Hmm, about a minute to solve it…

    Here’s a different one – 4 equilateral triangles with 6 matches without crossing them.

    1. This one I can do, took a few seconds. thinking tails not heads 😉

      but can’t see the answer to the main one yet. 😦

  2. I hate these puzzles, because the rules aren’t clear (although I’m pretty sure that I have the ‘correct’ answer). Equilateral triangles live in the world of geometry, matches don’t. Can we break the matches, superimpose them, cut them up into Cantorian dust? I’m thinking that the ‘correct’ answer has twice as many triangles as the answer that doesn’t contain as many physical objections (if that’s not giving away too much)…

    1. Excatly. You could break them each into 5 pieces and end up with 27 equilateral triangles, or split them each into 14 pieces to get 118. But I don’t think this is the solution he’s looking for.

    1. How does “not lying flat” mean “not equilateral?” An equilateral triangle simply is a triangle with all three sides the same length, regardless of dimensionality.

  3. I got a solution in just seconds. Oy vey! Perhaps all these puzzles are sharpening my problem-solving skills. (Or maybe I just got lucky.)

    I think some people are overthinking this. My solution is 2D and involves no breaking. (Though I’m curious to see how Simon solved it.)

  4. Done it in a few seconds. Now trying to solve the “4 equilateral triangles with 6 matches without crossing them.” puzzle

  5. Nice one. Got it quickly as did my 10 year old daughter.
    But could any friends called David get it?
    Plato helped me with the 6 matches 4 triangles.

  6. Few seconds and 2 drawings away… yes, easily solvable.

    I’m intrigued by what you asks… “how long we took?”… the idea is to gauge population’s subjective time? How many dead ends in average we experience before the final solution? Or it would be interesting to count the time we took effectively? But then, no one would be able to connect the times to correct answers (someone who’s said has found it, maybe has not). Lateral thinking like’s Simon is also interesting (actually, my first reaction before pick a paper was to break the matches) because some puzzle are solvable by bending the rules we thought there was there… the question is when to bend them or not.

  7. But not re beating the chimp… why noone wants to give it a trial? It requires miliseconds! And is really difficult even if you don’t have to think too much.

  8. About a minute with pen and paper to solve the first question, without breaking any match but getting 2 big triangles of the same size plus 6 smaller ones with the same size. Don’t know yet the answer to the 2nd question.

  9. Wow, for the second question. Now, that’s a nice twist considering how many triangles people are saying they achieve. I’m really interested to see the solutions they came through because I think I can prove that 8 is the maximum number of triangles we can achieve in the plane (It’s not that complicated to reach there and from it, the number 8 as the cube of 2, will came naturally). So, what I overlooked?

    A different question is how many ways of building those 8 triangles there are. Obviously, if we deem different two ways where the triangles are of different size, then the number of those ways are infinite. But if we cater for a different criteria, for example, how the triangle’s apexes might be oriented, then the number might be finite. To proceed further, that criteria would have to be established.

  10. rather under half a minute. I had paper-and-pencil ready as usual for the Friday Puzzle, then once I had read the puzzle I thought it would be better to go to the kitchen and get a matchbox. I had then solved the puzzle before even rising from my chair – it was the thought of the matchbox that did it!

  11. Believe it or not, this was curiously easy…. 16 seconds, and that’s total time of getting pen and paper and drawing it out… now for more configurations…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: