I still think “radically new” is a bizarre way to describe anything. It might be both radical and new, but what on earth is “radically new”? So new it doesn’t exist yet? It just means nothing.
What you think is the shadow of the father’s head, is the boy’s head. Focus on ths border of the shadow, you’ll see a nose. from there, you’ll get the whole pic!
Being a great fan of your books, it only took one glance at the poster in Southwark Underground Station before I had to buy Rip It Up!
Everyone and “there” dog?????
It’s probably less of a language sin than using five question marks.
Is it not supposed to be their?
There dog would mean something incorrect wouldn’t it?
Confused
took me quite a while before I understood what was going on on the second image. Cool!
Hope your book is grammar checked!
I ripped your poster up!
I still think “radically new” is a bizarre way to describe anything. It might be both radical and new, but what on earth is “radically new”? So new it doesn’t exist yet? It just means nothing.
A Dutchman wrote a book called “tijdelijk nieuw” which means “temporary new”.
I guess radically new means “not a bit new, but very much”
Could someone explain the second picture to me please?
What you think is the shadow of the father’s head, is the boy’s head. Focus on ths border of the shadow, you’ll see a nose. from there, you’ll get the whole pic!
“Levitate Woman” didn’t work. I’m monovision.
really funny >, <