It’s the Friday Puzzle…..

53

A fun mathematical puzzle this week. I have come up with a way of sorting numbers into one of three groups. Here are some examples of the numbers in my three groups….

Group One: 0, 3, 6, 8, 9

Group Two: 1, 4, 7, 11, 14

Group Three: 2, 5, 10, 12, 13

In which group should I place the numbers 15, 16 and 17?

As ever, please do NOT post your answers, but do say if you think you have solved the puzzle and how long it took. Solution on Monday.

I have produced an ebook containing 101 of the previous Friday Puzzles! It is called PUZZLED and is available for the Kindle (UK here and USA here) and on the iBookstore (UK here in the USA here). You can try 101 of the puzzles for free here.

53 comments on “It’s the Friday Puzzle…..

  1. Mike says:

    About 10 seconds – but only because something kind of similar passed across the radar a few days ago…

  2. Drew says:

    A few seconds. But only if I’ve got it right! Would like to test sice I can’t be sure.

  3. Murray P says:

    Very good

  4. Paul Pearson says:

    All I have to do is LOOK at this one and know it’s one to pass up . . .

    • The Masked Twit says:

      Paul
      I normally find these puzzles hard too, but you have given yourself a clue – “LOOK”
      TMT

  5. Niva says:

    15 secs or so. I’m pretty sure I got it, but with these kinds of puzzles you’ll never know if you’re right until you see the answer.

  6. Jimi says:

    Took me about 10 secs to figure it out.

  7. rhaywarduk says:

    I did think I had seen something similar as soon as I saw the numbers in list one – and the numbers in the other two lists confirmed that hypothesis. So a matter of seconds, but a bit of checking required, and I’m still not certain it’s right if this is a “mathematical” puzzle in the true sense of the word.

  8. DAVE! says:

    Took me 0.02154 seconds.
    I’m so amazing.

  9. idelta0 says:

    yes, done. Please – don’t call these ‘maths’ puzzles – it would make numerology and astrology sciences. This is an 11-plus type Verbal Reasoning / Kettell B style of puzzle (i.e. – NOT MATHS!)

  10. song bird. says:

    ?

  11. Gib says:

    Is there meant to be the number 1 twice in the second group ? Or should the second occurrence be an 11? I still haven’t solved it, but that looks odd.

  12. Alex says:

    Should that second 1 in group 2 be 11?

  13. Easy one. A few seconds. Calling it ‘mathematical’ is a bit of a red herring, but if you called it by a more appropriate name it looses the nuances of the very word ‘puzzle’.

  14. Pat says:

    Bugger! Published my guess , can I delete? I thought this was an email, not a comment (small phone screen, but that’s no excuse). I just hope I got it wrong now.

  15. Walter says:

    Took me exactly 33 seconds, which would go into group 1

  16. pdurrant says:

    It took me no longer than just reading the question. I had an inkling at group 2, and confirmed it with group 3.

  17. AMWhy says:

    I got it before I finished the question, but I love looking at numbers like that…

  18. slugsie says:

    It took me a couple of seconds.

    On a side note, I think I’ve been a programmer too long as my mind keeps wanting to change them to groups 0, 1, and 2.

  19. Dharmaruci says:

    i saw this straight at once away. perhaps studying the stars helps me with seeing patterns.
    would be easier if given in roman numbers, ha ha.

  20. mittfh says:

    About half a minute to work out the rules for all three groups, after which it only took a few seconds to allocate 15, 16, and 17 to the relevant group (hint: there’s a clue in that although 5, 6 and 7 are in separate groups, 15, 16 and 17 all belong in the same group – together with 18 and 19).

  21. Lazy T says:

    I agree with some of the comments above, as a maths puzzle this is a bit of a curveball. Solved in two boggles before I picked up a pen.

  22. deepfield says:

    These puzzles usually take me three days to find the answer: until Monday morning, right here…

  23. As Lazy T says, it’s a bit of a curveball, but I got it straightaway.

  24. Dormouse says:

    Took me only .0045 seconds to reject this puzzle as too boring to solve, but luckily I have the previous one still on the front burner… let me see, two trains pass, one will take 4 hours to complete, the other will take 1 hr, dont use algebra, do it in the head, ….. zzzzzz (should last a good six months of entertainment at this rate)

  25. dayuntoday says:

    I saw this one immediately, I think. For a change! :)

  26. I might not have gotten it without reading the comments. Richard’s term “mathematical puzzle” threw me. Richard, you devil, you.

  27. JohnLoony says:

    As soon as I was about half-way reading the first of the three lists of numbers.

  28. Chak says:

    Took me about 15 seconds to realize what the third group was, and after that, 2-3 seconds to put each into its proper group.

  29. Phil McCavity says:

    Why is this called Friday puzzle? It’s Saturday

  30. Carl says:

    A way to make this actually a “mathematical” problem would be to show how the distribution amongst the groups changes as the integers increase. Anyone?

  31. arrrgh, took a while to beat my math brain into submission and then look at this in a different light :)

  32. Eddie says:

    After a weekend puzzling over this one I think I’ve finally got it. It’s a bit black, white and grey.

  33. meoww says:

    Got it! Now to check whether it is the right answer!

  34. Phroggie says:

    Didn’t immediately spot the obvious, so it took about 30 seconds.

  35. Duncan says:

    I have a pretty good idea what the answer is, just don’t ask me to show my working…

  36. Gail Hatton says:

    too easy, pleeease give us something really difficult Richard, love maths

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s