Science of ghosts: New Research

22

wiseman2

Yesterday was a bit of a busy one because we launched two new online studies into the psychology of ghosts.

We are conducting the first international survey into alleged ghostly experiences, and also hunting for ghost photographs.  The photo on the left shows the first image on the site, and was taken in 1993 when i was researching in India.  There is a strange purple glow around the group.  More importantly, my choice of shorts, shoes and socks defy rational explanation.

Lots of media covered the story (including Channel 4, The Daily Telegraph, The Daily Express, The Metro, and The Daily Mail), but probably the most comprehensive piece is this feature in The Scotsman.

The ‘ghost’ photograph site has already had about forty thousand views from all around the world, and people have sent in lots of new photos for the site, so looks like the project has caught the public imagination.

The results of both studies will be announced at ‘Hauntings: The Science of Ghosts‘ on the 4th April. Very excited about the day. PA release about the project after the break.

Update: TV clip about it here.

Experts are inviting members of the public to send them spooky snapshots of alleged ghosts.

Hundreds of paranormal pictures are expected to be submitted online as part of the Edinburgh Science Festival.

They will be posted on a website and examined to see if any defy explanation.

Ghost-debunking psychologist Professor Richard Wiseman, who is heading the experiment, said: “About once a month I get sent a fairly good ghost photo where it’s not immediately obvious what’s going on.

“Often you might see what looks like a face in semi-darkness but its just a trick of the light. The human brain is hard-wired to see faces, for instance in clouds. That’s because faces are the most important thing we can see around us.

“I’m pretty sceptical, and usually there’s a rational explanation, but it could be that someone out there is sitting on something really interesting.”

A number of ghost pictures can already be seen on the site scienceofghosts.wordpress.com. One of the strangest appears to be the face of a little girl poking between the legs of a group of friends. It was taken at a house where there have been sightings of a ghostly child aged three or four.

“Believe it or not it’s just a very odd configuration of the light,” said Prof Wiseman. “These are always the hardest ones to explain.”

Another taken at a castle 22 years ago appears to show the transparent figure of a headless ghost in an army coat standing in front of two children playing on a cannon.

Prof Wiseman said: “The person who took it is absolutely convinced that it’s a photo of the headless ghost who walks around the castle walls. Maybe he’s angry with the kids playing around. This one might be a double exposure.”

22 comments on “Science of ghosts: New Research

  1. Liz says:

    It’s the white legs that are ghastly…er ghostly…..

  2. Frankie says:

    I’ve already bought my ticket and flights up to Edinburgh for that day – very excited about it and can’t wait to hear results of the studies, among all the talks!

  3. Erika says:

    Everyone in my office is talking about this this morning! now all curious and want to come to the day

  4. Frankie says:

    Just an aside – on the scienceofghosts website when you click to follow the link to the survey (“Regardless of whether you think you have experienced a ghost, please take part here.”) leads you to an error page. It may just be my computer but if it’s not then thought you might like to know about it!

  5. Richard Wiseman says:

    Frankie: Thanks for that. I THINK it is just high volume of traffic at the moment, but will double check.

  6. Ross Bagby says:

    Is this why we had those earlier bits about the “expressions” of the car and the spoon?

  7. oldebabe says:

    No one I know, or have known, has ever seen a ghost, or a ghost in a photo, nor have I, (except of course on TV, movies, online, etc.) and I’ve known a lot of people in various environments… And probably most people have had the same experience I have re:

    Just another urban/rural myth (or story to scare children) run amok?

    In some ways, doesn’t constantly looking into these claims just keep the nonsense going? Skepticism has limits, I would think…

  8. Leszek Cyfer says:

    I remember seeing a strange face in a window of a building on the opposite side of the street. For a moment I was spooked. Then I wanted to take a better look and stepped forward. The face disappeared.

    When I’ve step back the face returned. It was a totally random combination of leaves and branches reflecting in the window, visible only in the spot where I’d noticed it. Moving one step away and there was an usual window, no face…

  9. Jacqueline says:

    ‘More importantly, my choice of shorts, shoes and socks defy rational explanation.’ – That made me giggle most of the day.

    As far as the pictures go, I’m not convinced. Many look like fakes, or a result of exposure issues, developing issues, or dust particles. I got a night-vision camera set up in my livingroom once, and threw a few cushions around, the dust gave a similar effect to an orb when it floated in view of the lens.

  10. [...] Science of ghosts: New Research Yesterday was a bit of a busy one because we launched two new online studies into the psychology of ghosts. We are [...] [...]

  11. Nerdycatlover`s Ghost says:

    The Living TV programme, “Most Haunted” was interesting to begin with, but it got so completely over the top when Derek Acorah went into a trance every 5 minutes,( but always spoke in the same voice and said similar things), it completely cured me of watching the genre.
    In the end I felt it was insulting my intelligence, whereas before, I was quite prepared to believe in the paranormal.
    I`ve attended spiritualist meetings etc and tried to be open minded, but the cold readings are just fishing expeditions and “plants” as far as I`m concerned.I now think that people who go in for this kind of thing are happy to delude themselves or basically a bit thick.
    It`s turned into cheap entertainment,instead of scientific enquiry. Shame…..

  12. Frank Hollis says:

    Looks like the Telegraph got in just a little late…

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/5007735/UFOs-photographed-over-London.html

  13. Kat says:

    Has research ever been done, as to the relationship of ghost sightings to the cultural background of the sightee (is that a word?)? Are there cultures that really don’t believe in ghosts – where their mythology/cosmology doesn’t allow for their existence – and if these cultures exist, do members ever report ghost sightings? Or paranormally type experiences? I could probably word this better if I thought about it more, but hopefully you get the gist…

  14. Jen says:

    i love love love ghosts and the parlnomorl {sp}

  15. Jen says:

    i love love love ghosts and the paralnomarl {sp}

  16. Jen says:

    i love love love ghosts and the paralnormal {sp}

  17. Max_B says:

    Why even bother looking for apparitions in photographs…? If such experiences are real, they are almost certainly in your head, so hardly able to be photographed.

  18. Mynameidontwanttoshare says:

    Home work research thnxs for the information

  19. buy prescription glasses online…

    [...]Science of ghosts: New Research « Richard Wiseman[...]…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s